Web Desk
The political landscape in India heated up when Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, a senior Congress leader, was seen with a bag featuring a Palestinian flag design during a parliamentary session. This incident sparked a verbal clash between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Congress, with BJP labeling Congress as the “new Muslim League.” BJP spokespersons criticized the Congress party for allegedly siding with divisive narratives and accused them of pandering to identity politics.
BJP leaders tied the incident to historical grievances, drawing comparisons with the Muslim League, which played a pivotal role in India’s partition in 1947. Union Minister Anurag Thakur and other BJP figures emphasized that such actions hint at Congress’s ideological deviation and a broader agenda to undermine India’s unity.
Congress, on the other hand, dismissed these claims as baseless and accused BJP of sensationalizing the matter for political gains. According to Congress leaders, Priyanka’s bag choice was purely coincidental and not symbolic of any political or religious allegiance. They argued that BJP’s rhetoric aimed to divert attention from pressing national issues such as inflation, unemployment, and governance failures.
This controversy has reopened debates on secularism, political symbolism, and the boundaries of cultural representation in Indian politics. The debate also reflects the deep-rooted polarization between the two parties, as each attempts to consolidate their voter base ahead of upcoming elections.
Political analysts note that such controversies highlight how symbols—whether cultural, religious, or historical—can become focal points for national discourse and voter sentiment. With both parties using this incident to bolster their respective narratives, the issue continues to dominate political discussions nationwide
