Web Desk
The Supreme Court recently criticized the reinstatement of Tamil Nadu Minister V. Senthil Balaji, who remains in judicial custody for allegations of money laundering and involvement in a cash-for-jobs scam. Arrested in 2023 by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Balaji’s case has sparked debates over constitutional principles and governance ethics in the state.
Court’s Stand on the Governor’s Role
The apex court upheld the Madras High Court’s earlier ruling, stating that a governor cannot unilaterally dismiss a minister without the Chief Minister’s recommendation. This clarification reiterated the constitutional framework where the governor’s actions must align with the advice of the council of ministers, preserving the checks and balances of executive power.
Implications for Governance
Despite his arrest and ongoing legal proceedings, Balaji continues to hold a ministerial position without a portfolio. The court emphasized that such a situation undermines the ideals of ethical governance and the purity of administrative processes, calling for introspection within the state’s executive branch.
Opposition’s Viewpoint
Critics argue that allowing an incarcerated individual to retain ministerial responsibilities compromises the integrity of governance. They urge Chief Minister M.K. Stalin to act decisively and relieve Balaji of his duties, aligning with the ethical expectations of public office holders.
This case remains a significant marker in discussions about the intersection of legal accountability, constitutional provisions, and political practice in Tamil Nadu’s governance structure
